Freezing order
Updated 2026-09-29
A freezing order, also known as a Mareva injunction, is a court order restraining a defendant from dealing with, disposing of, or dissipating their assets generally, pending resolution of a claim. It is broader than a single-account freeze order directed at one bank or exchange account.
This type of order targets the defendant’s overall wealth and conduct, rather than just one identified account, and can cover property, other bank accounts, and assets not yet located. It is used where there is a real risk a defendant will move or hide assets to defeat a judgment.
Because it restrains a person’s broader financial dealings, courts apply a high threshold before granting one, and it is usually sought together with an ex parte application when speed is essential.
When it matters
A freezing order is considered when a defendant appears to have wider assets beyond the immediate scam proceeds, and there is a genuine risk those assets could disappear before trial.
Read next
APK scam: what to do right now
If you installed an app from a link and your phone or banking now looks wrong, here is what to do in the next few minutes to limit the damage.
Read thisBusiness email compromise: what to do
A supplier or director email asked you to pay a changed bank account. Here is how business email compromise works and the fastest response.
Read thisCrypto scam: what you can do
If a crypto exchange or wallet blocks your withdrawal after you met the operator on a chat app, here is how to trace what happened and what to do next.
Read thisWhat to do right after a scam
If you just realised you sent money to a scam, here is the order of first actions: stop paying, call your bank, call 997, and report it.
Read this