Skip to content
ScamVictimLawyer

When a scammer tries to hide assets

You suspect the person who took your money is now hiding it.

Updated 2026-09-29 · Independent resource. Legal review pending.

What counts as dishonest concealment

This provision under the Penal Code covers dishonestly or fraudulently hiding, moving, or disposing of property, or any interest in it. It is aimed at situations where someone deliberately puts assets out of reach to avoid a claim or a court judgment.

It is different from the main charge used in most scams, which covers the original deception. This one becomes relevant later, once the person responsible knows they are being pursued and tries to protect what they still hold.

Why it often surfaces once a case is underway

Once a scammer or an account holder realises a police report or a civil claim is coming, some try to move money into other accounts, convert it, or transfer assets to someone else. This is a recognised pattern, not an unusual one.

Signs can include a receiving account being emptied shortly after you report it, or property suddenly being transferred to a relative. Recognising this pattern early matters, since it directly affects how urgent your next step should be.

How it supports the urgency of a freezing order

If there is a real risk that funds or assets are being hidden, this strengthens the case for an urgent freezing order to preserve what remains. A court considering such an application generally wants to see a genuine risk of disappearance, and evidence of concealment speaks directly to that.

This provision itself is a criminal matter handled through a police report, while the freezing order is a separate civil step. Reporting a concealment attempt can still be worth doing even while a civil application is in progress.

What it does not do on its own

A report or charge relating to concealment does not, by itself, recover anything for you. It addresses the conduct of hiding assets, while recovering your loss still runs through a civil claim or, where relevant, a freezing order and eventual enforcement.

The two paths work best together: the criminal side discourages continued concealment, while the civil side is what can actually bring value back into reach.

What to do next

If you notice signs that funds or assets connected to your case are being moved, note the dates and details as soon as you see them. This kind of evidence is time-sensitive and often the most useful when it is fresh.

Speaking to someone quickly about whether an urgent tracing or freezing step fits your situation can make a real difference while assets are still within reach.

If you believe funds are being moved or hidden as your case progresses, tell us the timeline and we can help you weigh the urgent options.

Common questions

What does this law cover exactly?

It covers dishonestly or fraudulently hiding or moving property, or any interest in it, often to avoid a claim or a court judgment. It can apply when someone hides assets specifically to keep them out of reach.

When does this become relevant in a scam case?

It often becomes relevant once a scammer or account holder realises you are pursuing them, whether through a police report or a civil claim, and starts moving or hiding what remains. Recognising this pattern early can support an urgent legal step.

Does this replace the need for a freezing order?

No. This provision addresses the criminal side of hiding assets, while a freezing order is the civil tool that actually stops funds from moving. The two can support each other, but they work through different processes.

If you believe funds are being moved or hidden as your case progresses, tell us the timeline and we can help you weigh the urgent options.