Skip to content
ScamVictimLawyer

CEO impersonation scam: recovering the transfer

A staff member paid an urgent transfer after a fake director's message, and recovery is now the question.

Updated 2026-09-29 · Independent resource. Legal review pending.

The first hours after the transfer is discovered

Someone usually notices the payment does not match a real instruction only when the actual director asks about it directly. That moment starts the clock for any realistic recovery attempt.

Move quickly rather than spending time working out exactly how the message fooled your staff. Every hour that passes makes it more likely the funds have already left the receiving account.

Contact the bank first, then move to reporting, and leave the internal review for once the immediate actions are underway. This order gives the bank the best chance to act while the trail is still fresh.

Asking the bank about a recall

Contact your bank’s fraud team at once and describe the payment as an unauthorised transfer, not a routine dispute. Ask specifically about a recall or a hold on the receiving account.

A recall attempt works best within the same day, before the receiving bank releases the funds further. Give the transaction reference, the amount, the receiving account number, and the exact time of the transfer.

The bank needs these details immediately to act quickly, rather than asking you again later. Waiting to gather a fuller picture first usually costs more than it saves.

Reporting and reviewing who authorised the payment

Report the case to the police, including the Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID), with the message or call that triggered the transfer. Call the National Scam Response Centre on 997 if the transfer happened recently.

Alongside the report, review internally who approved the payment and why the usual checks were skipped. This is about understanding what happened, not assigning blame to the person who was targeted.

A short internal timeline, who sent what and when, helps both the bank and the police move faster. It also shows where a second approval step could have stopped the payment, similar to what happens in a business email compromise case.

Once the receiving account is known

If the bank or police confirm who controls the receiving account, a civil claim against the scammer or account holder becomes worth weighing. This matters most for larger amounts, where the cost of pursuing a claim is easier to justify.

Whether it is worth pursuing further depends on the sum involved and what the account holder actually has. Whether legal action is worth it sets out the questions that shape that decision.

Read more about how CEO impersonation scams work if you want to understand the pattern behind the message your staff received.

What to do next

Put the immediate actions in order: a bank recall request, a police report, and an internal note of the payment chain. Each step supports the others rather than replacing them.

Keep every message, call log, and transfer record together in one place. A lawyer or the police may ask for the full sequence, not just the final instruction.

If the amount is significant or the receiving account is now known, a short conversation can help you see the next step more clearly. You can also read more under legal options after a scam for how these cases are usually approached.

If your company sent an urgent transfer under a fake director's instruction, tell us what happened and we will help you see the realistic next step.

Common questions

Can a bank recall reverse a transfer made under a fake director's instruction?

Sometimes, if you act within the same day and the receiving bank has not released the funds further. Contact your bank's fraud team immediately, describe it as an unauthorised transfer, and give the account number, amount, and time. Speed matters more than a fully detailed explanation at this stage.

Who inside the company should report this first?

Whoever discovers the mismatch, usually the finance team or the real director, should report it internally right away instead of waiting for a full investigation. At the same time, contact the bank and file a police report, since neither step needs to wait for the other.

Is the employee who approved the transfer responsible for the loss?

The focus at this stage should be on response, not blame, since these messages are designed to fool careful people under pressure. A calm review afterward can show where the process needs a second check, which helps prevent a repeat rather than assign fault.

We now know which account received the money. What can we do?

A civil claim against the scammer or the account holder becomes worth considering once the receiving account is identified, especially for larger amounts. A first assessment can explain whether pursuing it makes sense, given the sum involved and what the account holder actually has.

If your company sent an urgent transfer under a fake director's instruction, tell us what happened and we will help you see the realistic next step.